Turkish Foreign Minister Mevl\u00fct \u00c7avu\u015fo\u011flu wrote an article entitled “Turkey\u00b4s Vision for Cyprus” in the Washington Times newspaper. In the article Cavusoglu stated the following:<\/p>\n
\u201cThe Eastern Mediterranean is currently fraught with security challenges. Failed states, mass migration and terrorism afflict the region. Amid this turmoil, however, a golden opportunity exists to resolve one issue that has eluded a lasting settlement for decades. I am referring to the island of\u00a0Cyprus. My government\u2019s vision for its future involves transforming the island into a bastion of peace, stability, cooperation and economic prosperity.<\/p>\n
The\u00a0Cyprus\u00a0issue is complex. The entity known today as the \u201cRepublic of Cyprus\u201d was a truly unique case. It was a partnership state purposefully designed as such and established nearly 60 years ago on the basis of three international treaties concluded between Great Britain,\u00a0Turkey, Greece and the two co-founder peoples on the island, the Turkish and Greek Cypriots. These two communities had been living on the island for centuries. They were and still are two distinct peoples with different religions, cultures and ethnicities. The special mechanism founded in 1960 aimed to reflect the understanding that these two communities could coexist peacefully side by side, in a functional federation based on their political equality, under guarantees provided by the two motherlands and Great Britain.<\/p>\n
Regrettably, the experiment failed after only three years. The Greek Cypriots forcibly ousted their Turkish Cypriot partners from all the organs of the young state, in open breach of the founding treaties and the Constitution. In 1964, a United Nations Peacekeeping Force was established on the island to protect the Turkish Cypriots from ethnic cleansing. Though negotiations between the two sides commenced in 1968, in 1974 a military junta in Greece attempted to annex\u00a0Cyprus\u00a0and prompted\u00a0Turkey\u2019s intervention in accordance with the 1960 Treaty of Guarantee. In 1983 the Turkish Cypriots set up their own republic while still striving for reconciliation with their erstwhile partners in the south. That search continues to this day. The goal is a completely new partnership.<\/p>\n
The Turkish Cypriots, with\u00a0Turkey\u2019s support, have consistently worked for a just and lasting comprehensive settlement despite the unjust isolation imposed on them by the Greek Cypriot side. Yet it was the Greek Cypriots who rejected numerous UN-sponsored settlement initiatives over the decades. Today the existing status quo on the island is unacceptable to both sides. A new, prosperous\u00a0Cyprus\u00a0without ethnic tensions will thus be welcomed by all concerned.<\/p>\n
This new state of affairs can come to life with a successful conclusion of the ongoing UN-sponsored negotiations. Any settlement must fulfil certain criteria in order to be sustainable and just. The two sides on the island must be\u00a0politically equal; one side cannot dominate the other or incorporate it as a mere minority. Power has to be shared in a bi-zonal, bi-communal partnership. The EU will ensure that the basic parameters of the settlement are legally anchored within its primary law. A balance between Greece and\u00a0Turkey\u00a0will be struck, meaning that Turkish nationals will be treated on an equal footing with Greek nationals exclusively on the Island.<\/p>\n
And finally, safeguards will be put in place to prevent any recurrence of the tragic events of the past. The robust framework provided by the existing Treaties of Guarantee and Alliance will continue to ensure the future stability of the island, where the presence of Turkish forces in the north has effectively been averting any further outbreak of conflict for over four decades. Opinion polls in Northern\u00a0Cyprus\u00a0clearly indicate that the vast majority of Turkish Cypriots will not accept a settlement that does not entail Turkish guarantees. Given their traumatic experiences at the hands of the Greek Cypriots in the \u201860s and early \u201870s, no one can blame them, especially after the Greek Cypriot side\u2019s recent attempt to introduce commemorations in their schools of the 1950 plebiscite on \u201cEnosis\u201d (union of\u00a0Cyprus\u00a0with Greece), to which the actual roots of the\u00a0Cyprus\u00a0issue can be traced.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Turkish Foreign Minister Mevl\u00fct \u00c7avu\u015fo\u011flu wrote an article entitled “Turkey\u00b4s Vision for Cyprus” in the Washington [\u2026]<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[19],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-140587","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news-headlines"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pio.mfa.gov.ct.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/140587","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pio.mfa.gov.ct.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pio.mfa.gov.ct.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pio.mfa.gov.ct.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pio.mfa.gov.ct.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=140587"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/pio.mfa.gov.ct.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/140587\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pio.mfa.gov.ct.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=140587"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pio.mfa.gov.ct.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=140587"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pio.mfa.gov.ct.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=140587"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}